A new performance survey by Global Info Analytics has ranked Members of Parliament (MPs) across 83 constituencies, with Frank Annoh-Dompreh, MP for Nsawam/Adoagyiri, emerging as the highest-rated lawmaker, while George Kwame Aboagye, MP for Asene-Manso-Akroso, recorded the lowest approval score.
The June 2026 survey assessed constituents’ perceptions of their MPs’ performance, revealing wide disparities in public approval across the country.
According to the polling firm, Annoh-Dompreh received a 98% “Excellent/Very Good/Good” rating, with only 2% of respondents describing his performance as “Poor/Very Poor.”
In contrast, Aboagye secured a 9% positive rating, while 87% of respondents rated his performance as “Poor/Very Poor,” placing him at the bottom of the rankings.
Top-Rated MPs
The survey identified several other MPs with strong approval ratings.
The MPs for Tolon and Tain each recorded 94% approval, followed by the MP for Navrongo Central with 93%. The MP for Offinso North received a 91% approval rating, while the MPs for Kpando and Tano North each polled 88%.
Lowest-Rated MPs
After Asene-Manso-Akroso, the constituencies with the lowest-rated MPs were Takoradi, which recorded a 13% approval rating, Bosomtwe (15%), Achiase (16%) and Bole-Bamboi (21%).
Voter Uncertainty
The survey also found that some constituencies recorded relatively high proportions of respondents who expressed no opinion on their MPs’ performance.
Bosomtwe recorded the highest proportion of “No opinion” responses at 18%, followed by Asuogyaman with 15%, suggesting that a significant number of constituents remain undecided or less engaged in assessing the performance of their parliamentary representatives.
Global Info Analytics said the survey is part of its ongoing efforts to monitor public perceptions of parliamentary performance across the country.
The findings come amid increasing public scrutiny of MPs’ responsiveness to constituency development needs and growing calls for greater accountability ahead of future elections.
However, the polling firm did not immediately publish details of the survey’s methodology, including its sample size, constituency-level sampling framework or margin of error.
