A routine inspection tour by the Minister for Roads and Highways, Kwame Governs Agbodza, turned confrontational on Monday after he observed limited progress on the Techiman–Wenchi road project, despite the disbursement of GH¢66 million in mobilisation funds.
The Minister, accompanied by his deputy and the Bono East Regional Minister, expressed strong dissatisfaction upon discovering that, five months after the release of funds, the contractor had undertaken only surface vegetation clearing, with no visible work on graveling, drainage, or structural components.
Describing the situation as unacceptable, the Minister questioned the contractor’s performance and adherence to the project timeline, noting that mobilisation funds are intended to expedite early-stage construction activities, not delay them.
Deputy Roads Minister Suhuyini reinforced this position, emphasising that mobilisation funds constitute a performance-based advance and must translate into measurable progress on site.

The contractor has been summoned to appear before the Ministry on Thursday, May 7, 2026. The Minister cautioned that failure to demonstrate the technical and operational capacity to execute the project could lead to termination of the contract and reassignment to a more capable firm.
He further reiterated the government’s commitment to its infrastructure agenda, warning that underperformance would not be tolerated.
The Bono East Regional Minister also voiced concern over the slow pace of work and announced plans to intensify oversight through regular, unannounced inspections across all road projects in the region. He added that comprehensive technical audits would be conducted to ensure compliance with contractual obligations and prevent further delays.
Residents and road users along the Techiman–Wenchi–Sawla corridor have welcomed the intervention, citing prolonged frustration over the lack of visible progress. Some expressed hope that the Minister’s actions would lead to tangible improvements in the execution of the project.
The Ministry is expected to determine the next course of action following the contractor’s scheduled appearance, including the possibility of contract termination or accelerated implementation under stricter supervision.